Report and Accounts 2023 | 41
Strategic Report
Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Report Notice of Meeting
Other Information
Chairman’s StatementOverview Auditor’s Report
Principal Risks Mitigation by strategy Actions taken on Principal Risks in the year
Service providers and systems security – Errors, fraud or control
failures at service providers or loss of data through business
continuity failure or cyber attacks could damage reputation or
investors’ interests or result in loss. Cyber risks remain heightened.
The ancillary functions of administration, company secretarial,
accounting and marketing services are all carried out by the
Manager. Custody and depositary services are provided by third
party suppliers.
The Board monitors the effectiveness and efficiency of service
providers’ processes through internal efficiency KPIs.
The Audit and Management Engagement Committee and the Board have regularly reviewed
the Company’s risk management framework with the assistance of the Manager. Regular
control reports are provided by the Manager which cover risk, compliance and oversight
of third-party service providers, including IT security and cyber-threats. Reports from the
Depositary, which is liable for the loss of any of the Company’s securities and cash held in
custody unless resulting from an external event beyond its reasonable control, were reviewed.
The Board is satisfied that the continuity arrangements of all key suppliers continued to work
well and as such, this risk is unchanged.
Investment performance – Inappropriate business strategy or
policy, or ineffective implementation, could result in poor returns for
shareholders. Failure to access the targeted market or meet investor
needs or expectations, including Responsible Investment and climate
change in particular, leading to significant pressure on the share price.
Political risk factors could also impact performance as could market
shocks such as those experienced in relation to Covid-19 and the war
in Ukraine.
Under our Business Model, a manager is appointed with the
capability and resource to manage the Company’s assets, asset
allocation, gearing, stock and sector selection and risk. The
individual regional investment portfolios are managed to provide in
combination a well-diversified, lower volatility and lower risk overall
portfolio structure. The Board holds a separate strategy meeting
each year and considers investment policy review reports from the
Manager at each Board meeting.
The performance of the Company relative to its Benchmark,
its peers and inflation is a KPI measured by the Board on an
ongoing basis and is reported on page 39.
Columbia Threadneedle has been retained as Manager and continues to deliver on the
Company’s objective. It operates within a responsible investment culture under a corporate
commitment to four key Sustainability Principles: Social Change, Financial Resilience,
Community Building and Environmental Impact. Through the Manager, the Company has
the flexibility to innovate, adapt and evolve as Responsible Investment necessities and
expectations change. Marketing and investor relations campaigns continued throughout the
year, including presentations by the Lead Manager to wealth managers across the country.
Detailed reports provided by the Lead Manager have been reviewed by the Board at each of
its meetings. Strong operational performance from the investment portfolio over the year has
resulted in the dividend for the year increasing by 25%. In overall terms, this risk is considered
unchanged.
Discount/premium – A significant share price discount or premium
to the Company’s NAV per share, or related volatility, could lead to
high levels of uncertainty or speculation and the potential to reduce
investor confidence. Increased uncertainty in markets due to an event
such as Covid-19 or the significant rise in inflation could lead to falls
and volatility in the Company’s NAV.
The Board has established share buyback and share issue policies,
together with a dividend policy, which aim to moderate the level
and volatility of the share price discount or premium to the NAV
per share and it seeks shareholder approval each year for the
necessary powers to implement those policies.
The discount/premium to NAV at which the Company's shares
trade is a KPI measured by the Board on an ongoing basis and is
reported on page 39.
Despite actively buying in shares on a regular, ongoing basis in order to address the
imbalance between the supply and demand of the Company's shares, the discount has
remained wider than desired. During the course of the year, the Manager has stepped up
marketing activity over a number of channels and is working to enhance the messaging
around the core investment proposition. This activity aims to stimulate demand for the
Company’s shares from existing and new investors. Given the higher prevailing discount level
the risk is considered to have increased during the year.
Through a series of stress tests ranging from moderate to extreme scenarios, including the
impact of market shocks and based on historical information, but forward looking over the five
years commencing 1 May 2023, the Board assessed the risks of:
• Sustained high levels of inflation.
• Potential illiquidity of the Company’s portfolio.
• Substantial falls in investment values on the ability to meet loan covenant requirements and to
repay and re-negotiate funding.
• Significant falls in income on the ability to continue paying steadily-rising dividends and
maintaining adequate revenue reserves.
The Board also took into consideration the operational robustness of its principal service
providers and the effectiveness of business continuity plans in place, potential effects of
regulatory changes and the potential threat from competition. The Board’s conclusions are set
out under ‘Five Year Horizon’.
Resilience
The Board is cognisant of the Brydon Report’s proposal for companies to make a resilience
statement, which will address resilience to risks over the short, medium and long term. The
Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy has taken forward this proposal, amongst
others, with a consultation that will result in changes in regulation. Whilst the regulations resulting
from the consultation are still awaited, it is likely that the Board will be required to include a
resilience statement, encompassing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, its
medium term viability and what it considers to be its key long-term challenges, and how those are
being addressed, in future. It is likely that the Company will also be required to adopt and publish
an “Audit and Assurance Policy” which will include, amongst other things, an explanation of the
independent assurance it proposes to obtain for the resilience statement and the effectiveness of
the internal controls framework. It is proposed that the policy should cover a three-year period and
be subject to an annual advisory vote by shareholders.
Based on its assessment and evaluation
of the Company’s future prospects, the
Board has a reasonable expectation that
the Company will be able to continue in
operation and meet its liabilities as they
fall due over the coming five years. This
period has been chosen because it is
consistent with the advice provided by
many investment advisers, that investors
should invest in equities for a minimum
of five years. The Company’s business
model, strategy and the embedded
characteristics listed below have helped
define and maintain the stability of the
Company over many decades. The
Board expects this to continue and
will continue to assess viability over
subsequent five year rolling periods.
• The Company has a long-term
investment strategy under which it
invests mainly in readily realisable,
publicly listed securities and which
restricts the level of borrowings.
• The Company’s business model and
strategy are not time limited and, as
a global investment trust company,
are unlikely to be adversely impacted
as a direct result of Brexit and other
political uncertainties.
• The Company is inherently structured
for long-term outperformance, rather
than short-term opportunities, with five
years considered as a sensible time-
frame for measuring and assessing
long-term investment performance.
• The Company is able to take
advantage of its closed-end
investment trust structure, such
as having borrowing arrangements
in place and the ability to secure
additional finance in excess of five
years.
• There is rigid monitoring of the
headroom under the Company’s bank
borrowing financial covenants.
• Regular and robust review of
revenue and expenditure forecasts
is undertaken throughout the year
against a backdrop of large revenue
and capital reserves.
• The Company retains title to all assets
held by the Custodian which are
subject to further safeguards imposed
on the Depositary.
Five Year Horizon